Latest Videos

Negotiating Pay for Call Contracts with Hospitals

Posted by | Dec 2021

Evan R. Goldfischer, MD, MBA, FACS, urologist and Director of the Research Department at Premier Medical Group in Poughkeepsie, New York, discusses hospital service line agreements and the process of negotiating beneficial pay for call contracts. He begins by explaining physician health system alignment and how alignment can look different depending on how much autonomy a physician desires. Dr. Goldfischer explains that hospitals want to partner with urologists because they need urologic specialization for a wide variety of patients and do not know how to effectively manage service lines, and that urologists should desire partnership because it reduces the incentive for internal urology departments and gives urologists the opportunity to improve the condition of their practice. He also states that there is a great deal of benefit to patients due to access to well-trained and educated specialists. Dr. Goldfischer also describes how call coverage and quality improvement service arrangements function to benefit a hospital, and outlines the call coverage responsibilities, including 24/7 coverage 365 days a year, unassigned inpatients, daily rounds, and more. He then details call coverage compensation in terms of flat fee coverage. Dr. Goldfischer explains the variables involved in deciding flat fees such as extent of burden, extent of treatment, fair market value, and probability of providing uncompensated care. He details quality based payment strategies and how to collect evidence on the positive changes a physician has made as part of a hospital as a way to prove value. Dr. Goldfischer concludes by stating that physicians understand their specialty and should be compensated for achieving higher quality work and lower costs.

Read More

Evidence-Based Approach to Management of Urethral Strictures

Posted by | Dec 2021

Shyam S. Sukumar, MD, Assistant Professor of Urology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, poses the question, “What is the most accurate modality to diagnose an anterior urethral stricture?” He discusses studies that conclude that a retrograde urethrogram (RUG) is recommended over urethral ultrasonography (sono-urethrography, or SUG) or magnetic resonance urography (MRU) due to its widespread availability, familiarity, and ability to evaluate the entire urethra. Dr. Sukumar outlines treatments including endoscopic and reconstructive options. He homes in on the question of optimal initial treatment for short (1-2cm) bulbar urethral strictures, sharing data that emphasize the low success rate of direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) and points out that successive DVIUs also negatively impact subsequent urethroplasty. He concludes that DVIU and dilation have similarly poor efficacy, that urethroplasty is more cost effective and clinically effective than endoscopic management, and that a single attempt at endoscopic management is appropriate for select patients but practitioners should avoid further attempts. Dr. Sukumar then turns to anastomotic urethroplasty, illustrating methods to shorten the distance in anastomotic urethroplasty and concluding the procedure has an 86-95 percent success rate at five years and an 86 percent success rate at 15 years. He explains non-transecting anastomotic urethroplasty and substitution urethroplasty, pointing out that buccal grafts are now considered standard of care. He shares data on substitution urethroplasty, noting that it is not as successful as anastomotic urethroplasty. Dr. Sukumar poses the question of whether ventral versus dorsal graft placement is desirable, citing a review concluding that the success rates are comparable, thereby recommendations take into consideration surgeon experience and that dorsal placement is preferable for distal bulbar or penile urethra. He also discusses synchronous urethral strictures, post-hypospadias recurrences for staged urethroplasty, perineal urethrostomy, and augmented perineal urethrostomy. Dr. Sukumar addresses failed prior urethroplasty, recommends one attempt at a DVIU over a dilation, and describes recommended procedures. Dr. Sukumar concludes that urethroplasty provides patients with the best outcomes, that practitioners should be prepared to adapt since no single type of repair can be presumed to be optimal preoperatively, and that evidence-based management of urethral stricture disease will benefit from better-quality studies.

Read More

Emerging Role of PSMA Imaging

Posted by | Dec 2021

Steven P. Rowe, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Radiology and Radiological Science at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, discusses the emerging role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging. He defines PSMA as a transmembrane carboxypeptidase highly expressed in prostate cancer cells. This expression has been observed in over 95 percent of prostate cancer tumors, with a direct correlation between expression levels and tumor aggressiveness. Due to this, Dr. Rowe asserts that PSMA is an excellent target for molecular imaging of prostate cancer. Dr. Rowe displays a PSMA structure and activity diagram and explains that PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) has moderate sensitivity and very high specificity for pre-operative nodal staging, high detection efficiency for sites of biochemical recurrence (BCR), and can effectively guide focal therapy for oligometastases and is effective in selecting patients for endoradiotherapy. He then discusses each of these in more detail, highlighting data from a study that evaluated the diagnostic performance of PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of men at high risk for harboring metastatic prostate cancer. Dr. Rowe shows data on PSMA-based therapy and points out that for patients with more widespread metastatic disease, treatment may include PSMA inhibitors such as lutetium-177. Dr. Rowe expects that lutetium-based PSMA therapy will be approved by the FDA and become part of the standard of care for patients with widespread metastatic disease. Dr. Rowe then outlines lingering questions about PSMA PET imaging, including how prognostic findings may look for different patient populations, how doctors should follow response to therapy given that decreasing androgen signaling leads to increase in PSMA expression, and what role artificial intelligence (AI) is going to play. Dr. Rowe illustrates data from the Observation vs. Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (ORIOLE) trial results for oligometastatic disease, pointing out that patients who had all lesions visible on a PSMA scan treated had better outcomes than those who only had a subset of their PSMA-positive lesions treated. Dr. Rowe predicts that in the near term, AI will provide lesion classification, whole-body tumor burden assessments, and prognostication and decision-making based on scan findings and clinical data. In conclusion, Dr. Rowe explains that, based on existing studies, there are already multiple indications for diagnostic PSMA-based imaging, with the caveat that researchers are just starting to understand PSMA-targeted PET findings as imaging biomarkers, and currently there are still questions about the interface of PSMA PET with AI.

Read More

The Latest Dope on Medical Marijuana

Posted by | Dec 2021

Grand Rounds in Urology Contributing Editor Neil H. Baum, MD, Professor of Urology at Tulane Medical School, discusses the latest research on medical marijuana, noting that it is increasingly popular with patients and that almost all physicians, including urologists, should expect questions about it. He gives a brief history of cannabis, from its use as an herbal medicine in 500 BCE, to its criminalization in 1937 and, eventually, to its legalization for both medical and recreational uses over the last few decades. Dr. Baum then defines several terms, explaining the difference between cannabidiol (CBD), which is not psychoactive and has anti-inflammatory properties, and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is psychoactive and increases appetite. He lists the conditions marijuana is purportedly beneficial for including chronic pain, alcohol and drug addiction, insomnia, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, social anxiety, nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy, gastrointestinal disorders, multiple sclerosis, and certain forms of epilepsy. Dr. Baum notes that while there is some evidence supporting marijuana’s benefits for several of these conditions, randomized controlled trials are needed to substantiate many claims.

Read More

Join the GRU Community

- Why Join? -