Select Page

2024

Management of Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: Surgical Options with Reference to the Guidelines

Fiona C. Burkhard, MD, discusses the surgical management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). Dr. Burkhard begins with an overview of the prevalence of NLUTD, its patterns related to spinal cord injury (SCI), and treatment goals. She summarizes guidelines from the European Association of Urology (EAU), the American Urological Association (AUA) and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) regarding the surgical management of NLUTD.

Dr. Burkhard then describes clam ileocystoplasty, and shares data on the procedures’ success in stabilizing renal function and preventing anatomical deterioration. She cautions that lifelong follow-up is essential. Dr. Burkhard shares quality-of-life (QoL) data showing improvement after augmentation.

She addresses additional EAU, AUA, and SUFU guidelines on urinary diversion, before highlighting data on sex differences in bladder management, symptoms, and satisfaction after SCI. Dr. Burkhard addresses reflux prevention, bladder outlet, and catheterization issues.

Dr. Burkhard summarizes her lecture by emphasizing that, while variations exist in the grading of recommendations, overall recommendations for treatment are similar across guidelines. She reiterates the importance of the patient’s perspective and lifelong follow-up in highlighting the advantages of surgical management.

Read More

Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer

Ericka Bagi, BSN, RN, discusses diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer, emphasizing their pivotal role in guiding personalized treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes.
Bagi analyzes biomarker tests, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its derivatives, PSA density, and PSA velocity. Further, she discusses biomarkers such as the Gleason score, genomic classifiers (e.g., Oncotype DX, Prolaris), and molecular markers (e.g., TMPRSS2-ERG fusion). Information from these tests is instrumental in tailoring treatment plans to individual patient profiles, optimizing therapeutic strategies, and minimizing unnecessary interventions for low-risk patients.
Novel biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosome-based markers, and genetic mutations (e.g., BRCA mutations), hold promise for further refining risk assessment and treatment selection. These biomarkers provide complementary information to traditional clinical and imaging evaluations, enabling a comprehensive understanding of disease biology and response to therapy.
Ericka Bagi underscores the importance of integrating biomarker testing into routine clinical practice to enhance diagnostic accuracy, prognostic certainty, and therapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer management. Standardized protocols for biomarker assessment and interpretation ensure consistency across healthcare settings, facilitating evidence-based decision-making and improving patient care outcomes.

Read More

Cardiovascular Side Effects of ADT

Robert H. Eckel, MD, FAHA, FACC, FNLA, outlines common cardiovascular risks in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Dr. Eckel launches his talk by explaining the most common non-prostate cancer cause of death in men with metastatic prostate cancer is cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Dr. Eckel points out the potential molecular connections between CVD and prostate cancer. He illustrates tissue-specific effects in terms of adverse cardiovascular consequences of various ADTs.

Dr. Eckel displays data on adjusted hazard ratios of cardiovascular events in prostate cancer patients with and without ADT exposure and points out ADT increases risk of heart failure in men without preexisting CVD. He points out chemotherapy and immunotherapy are also associated with increased CVD risk and shares a science advisory on ADT and CVD risk, outlining factors to examine such as obesity, serum lipids, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, waist-hip ratio, and C-reactive protein.

Dr. Eckel explains there is no formalized approach for identification or stratification of cardiovascular risk or tools to reduce risk. He describes a multidisciplinary panel tasked with considering the challenges in managing cardiovascular risk in men with prostate cancer on ADT.

Dr. Eckel summarizes the panel’s recommendation of an assessment tool that identifies CVD risks for men with prostate cancer, which can be exacerbated by treatment. He explains that urologic oncology providers comfortable managing CVD risk factors are empowered to do so and highlights the importance of communication and the “village” of providers (e.g. cardiologists, PCPs, etc.) who may be involved in comprehensive care. He emphasizes these risks are not static and reassessment and follow-up must be ongoing.

Read More

Endoscopic Management of Upper Tract UC and the Role of Mitomycin

Cayce Nawaf, MD, discusses the relationship between mitomycin and endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UC). Dr. Nawaf begins with a quick overview of upper tract UC, noting that it is relatively rare.

Dr. Nawaf then compares the outcomes of endoscopic management against those of nephroureterectomy. He illustrates the 5- and 10- year oncologic outcomes from both treatments, demonstrating the similarities between grade groups and presenting the AUA guidelines as additional support.

Dr. Nawaf addresses concerns regarding agent delivery methods to the kidney, and presents examples of nephrostomy tubes, double pigtail stents, and ureteral catheters. He presents data from the OLYMPUS Trial supporting the efficacy of retrograde delivery via ureteral catheter.

Regarding agents, Dr. Nawaf presents data on the efficacy of mitomycin While 58.8-61% of patients had a complete response to the treatment, he notes that there are moderate to severe side effects and caveats around endoscopic management of upper tract UC with mitomycin.

He concludes with a step-by-step guide to using mitomycin in treatment. Dr. Nawaf underscores the importance of selecting patients correctly for treatment based on disease grade and patient preference.

Read More

Making Sense of BPH: Which Treatment for Which Patient – Review of Guidelines for BPH

Seth K. Bechis, MD, reviews the 2023 American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment. Dr. Bechis begins by enumerating the currently available procedures for BPH treatment, with less invasive approaches favoring ease of use, minimal morbidity, and minimal ejaculatory problems versus the more invasive approaches favoring definitive efficacy and durability of results.

Dr. Bechis shares the 2023 AUA guidelines on surgical management of BPH and explains considerations for treatment choice include prostate size, presence of a median lobe, and preferences regarding sexual function. He covers guidelines for:

Prostatic Urethral Lifts
Water Vapor Thermal Therapy
Temporarily Implanted Prostatic Devices
Greenlight Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP)
Drug-Eluting Catheters
Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)
Robotic Waterjet Treatment (Aquablation)

Dr. Bechis concludes by explaining how he counsels patients by reviewing the data together and involving them in shared decision-making. He stresses the importance of anticipating recovery pathways and post-op hurdles for each treatment.

Read More

Join the GRU Community

- Why Join? -