Dr. Jehonathan Pinthus presented “Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer (NEPC)” at the 27th annual International Prostate Cancer Update meeting on Thursday, January 26, 2017.



Keywords: prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma, androgen, castration-resistant, kinase, neuroendocrine

How to cite: Pinthus, Jehonathan. “Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer (NEPC)” January 26, 2017. Accessed Oct 2019. https://grandroundsinurology.com/neuroendocrine-prostate-cancer-nepc



Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer (NEPC)


Neuroendocrine cells are actually part of the normal prostate. You can detect them in the benign prostate as well if you do the right staining. This is with chromogranin and synaptophysin. They’re probably part of the normal, they are part of the normal architecture of the prostate, they are in the basil cell compartment. They have dendritic cells and they play a regulatory role via their trophic neuropeptides, bombesin, calcitonin, serotonin, PTH, VEGF and so forth and so on. Those are terminally differentiated cells, so they don’t have a proliferative capacity and they express anti-apoptotic factors.

But the neuroendocrine cells can come and present themselves as a prostate cancer tumor. In an extreme case, which I would not talk much about, is the primary de novo, if you will, neuroendocrine prostate cancer. This is a very rare disease, less than 1% of prostate cancer patients. Usually in the form of small cell carcinoma of the prostate. They are sometimes large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma or carcinoid. There’s different and new pathophysiological classifications. It’s phenotype of frequent visceral and bulky soft tissue metastases, lytic bone lesion, and they’re usually responding early, but for a short time cytotoxic chemotherapy, cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with taxanes. They do not secrete PSA, they have very low levels of PSA, but high levels of another surrogate marker, the chromogranin (CgA).

But what’s interesting is what happens with neuroendocrine cells during the evolution of prostate cancer. So as I mentioned here on the left you can see normal neuroendocrine cells within benign prostate. They are in every hormone naïve adenocarcinoma there are neuroendocrine cells that residing there, and I’ll show you in about 25% of at least of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, if you look for that you will find it, unless it will express itself by frank neuroendocrine carcinoma, and that has a prognostic significance and a special clinical entity which I’ll talk about.

So neuroendocrine differentiation in hormone naïve prostate cancer, up to 10% prostatic adenocarcinoma contained clusters and aggregates of neuroendocrine-like malignant cells, focal neuroendocrine differentiation. They have the same genetic material, if you will, or genetic origin from the neighboring adenocarcinoma cells, and we talk about the – – arrangement. And their prognosis, their presence there is unclear in terms of prognosis.

But what’s very interesting, I think that would be the topic today is the secondary development of neuroendocrine prostate cancer. So it has been estimated that about 25% of lethal prostate cancers are neuroendocrine prostate cancer in large phenotype. And it’s a trans-differentiation actually from adenocarcinoma cells probably due to epithelial plasticity because of selective pressure. And the selective pressure is androgen deprivation. And the more the merrier, if you will, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. There is also some thought that they have a common progenitor as the adenocarcinoma cells. I won’t get too much into that.

The interesting thing is those neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells are resistant ADT. And they actually can act as an inner stimulant for tumorginicity, because they act as a source for paracrine signals via their secretion of serotonin, bombesin, calcitonin, et cetera, and we’ll talk about that.

So how common is that? This is actually from an abstract that was presented in American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in 2014. I couldn’t follow that with a paper, actually paper, but that was a very interesting study. They looked at their cover material from a prostatic biopsy signs and stain if with a neuroendocrine markers, and you can see that they excluded small-cell carcinoma, but you can see that up to 50% of the tumors, or the metastatic deposits showed positive staining for neuroendocrine markers. So 44, and that was also observed in 44% of the hormone sensitive cases, and up to 56% of the castration-resistant prostate cancer, so it’s very, very common thing.

You can add to that the observation that circulating tumor cells from patients with neuroendocrine prostate cancer are identified in about 10% or 11% of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, so it’s there.

Does it have prognostic significance? It seems to be true when you talk about castration-resistant prostate cancer, this is just one example; a Japanese study looking at 28 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer at the time of progression, and they showed in a multi-varied analysis that the lack of androgen receptors and a strong neuroendocrine differentiation staining were related to adverse prognoses once castration-resistant prostate cancer occurred. So not only it’s there, it’s important.

So this is a very interesting observation. So we know that the ERG gene rearrangement is kind of a hallmark of adenocarcinoma, genetic phenotype, genetic genotyping, if you will, of prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma. But that actually exists in neuroendocrine cells, and this actually an example of the extreme end of neuroendocrine differentiation of small-cell carcinoma, so this study looked at small-cell carcinoma of the lungs, small-cell carcinoma of the bladder, and small-cell carcinoma of the prostate, and only in small-cell carcinoma of the prostate this ERG gene rearrangement was present. So this finding supports a very common origin for adenocarcinoma and small-cell carcinoma, or if you will, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate.

So let’s go through the evolutionary transformation of classic adenocarcinoma to a neuroendocrine cancer, so as you saw above in the histological staining, you have it in benign prostate, then you have it hormone naïve prostate cancer, and that shows rearrangement of the TMPRSS2-ERG gene supporting a common origin. But then with the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer through the evolution of prostate cancer you can see that there are typical genetic changes that would explain the aggressiveness of this tumor. So first there is the loss of AR, so androgen-regulated genes. Neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells do not express the androgen receptor. Now, with that, after that comes the induction of neuroendocrine in neural program. And that is accompanied by first loss of tumor suppression, so TP53, RB1, commonly, or deleted or suppressed in neuroendocrine prostate cancer, which leads to genomic instability. And on top of that, the final heat is the upregulation of aurora kinase-A, which we’ll talk about MYCN amplification which results in a significant mitotic activation. So those are specific molecular pathways with the androgen deprivation therapy can not touch.

I’ll give you an example. Here is this study that we did, actually, back when I was doing my PhD, so this, we used to take prostate cancer tissue from patients and plant them into mice and try to develop a different unique xenograf. So this, we called it a WISH-PC2, Y22 – -, WISH-PC2. This was from a patient that had a very aggressive adenocarcinoma of the prostate, treated long-term with hormones. We took the tumors. We implanted into mice, and what you can actually see is that these xenograf developed into a small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Now, interestingly enough, you could see that if you treated these mice with a testosterone the tumor still; although, it didn’t not have the androgen receptor, still got bigger. So it grew faster. And this is very interesting, because this would potentially talk about the fact that we still need to need androgen deprivation therapy to these patients, because it’s always a bit of a mix between adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells, and the effect of androgens can effect the surrounding stroma, and that would fit back to the prostate cancer cells. For example, through VEGF and so, so there’s still some advantage of castration in these tumors, and this has been shown here.

This is a classical neuroendocrine prostate cancer. You can see that if you implant into a mouse’s prostate you develop a tumor, neuroendocrine tumors, which completely replace the tumor. It can cause liver metastases, which is typical as a visceral metastatic. You can see here that if you put it into tibia it can induce lytic, typical lytic bone lesions. What’s not shown here is that this tumor model actually secretes chromogranin-A, which is surrogate and correlate with the tumor volume.

So transdifferentiation from an epithelial-like phenotype to a neuroendocrine-like phenotype can be a consequence of treatment induced selective pressure. And I think this is a very important point. So we are creating in our hands a neuroendocrine prostate cancer, and I believe, it is really my belief that we’ll see more, and more, and more of those with all of the manipulation that Neal described to you.

Let’s see how that works, okay. So this is a classical work, looking at LNCaP cells, those are prostate cancer cells that have the androgen receptor, and if you delete androgen you will induce neuroendocrine differentiation. If you will restore androgen you will suppress the neuroendocrine differentiation. And what’s very interesting, and I think it’s very relevant in our era, and there is an aquisition of neuroendocrine phenotypes in prostate cancer cells which can be induced by chronic exposure to docetaxel. So it’s not only the androgens, you can pressure cells, or prostate cancer cells to become neuroendocrine cells.

How does that happen? There are many explanations. This is one example. Androgen inhibits REST. REST is a gene that actually regulates neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer cells. In this example it’s LNCap cells. And you can see that if you add—if you silence the REST there is neuroendocrine differentiation. If you add androgens that does the same. And here is on the left you can see an area of genes that relates to neuroendocrine differentiation, and you can see that REST induces them. And when you abolish androgens you can see that REST is inhibited, and therefore you’re gaining the phenotype of adenocarcinoma.

I’ll skip that one. So here’s another thing, okay, so we deprive androgens from adenocarcinoma, from a very aggressive adenocarcinoma cells, so we are treating actually the exocrine prostatic cancer cell, the adenocarcinoma cells, but we leave behind the neuroendocrine cells that actually act as an inner engine, because these cells secretes significant trophic factors, such as; for example, bombesin, calcitonin, PTHRP. So not only that we are not targeting the neuroendocrine cells that do not have the androgen receptor, we actually leave them to secrete their trophic signals, which can act on the adenocarcinoma cells in an androgen-independent pathway. This is just one example here. You can see that neuroendocrine cells in a benign prostate, or adenocarcinoma do secrete IL8, for example. This works on the CXCR2 and that activates the P53. But the thing is that with neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells there is no P53. So what you’re left with is a vicious circle of autocrine proliferation.

So what do we do with that? This is a very nice paper, and a very nice actually I think life-long work by the group of Mark Rubin and Dr. Beltran, and they looked at the molecular characterization of neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells. And what’s very interesting, and I’ll just give that, because this is the bottom line, is that Aurora kinase A and MYCN are over amplified in clinical specimens with neuroendocrine cells. Now the interesting thing is that it goes early on as in unselective, if you will, primary prostate cancer to primary prostate cancer patients who progress to neuroendocrine prostate cancer. And you can see the gene amplification of both the Aurora kinase A and MYCN, so it’s very, very, very common. Look at what happens in metastatic treatment induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer. And treatment-induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer means it’s a disease that we induced with our androgen deprivation therapy. It’s highly, highly over expressed.

Here’s another example. AURKA’s over expression primary prostatic adenocarcinoma patient who developed progression to neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells. So it’s actually there even before the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer and neuroendocrine prostate cancer, so it’s early on within the patients who are destined to develop neuroendocrine prostate cancer.

MYCN is a proto-oncogen encoding transcription factor which regulates—which is in normal physiology, if you will, is important early embryogenesis for neural stem cells. But it is upregulated in neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells and causing the proliferative effect and the differentiation to neuroendocrine tissues. And the interesting thing is that the Aurora kinase A, which is a cell cycle regulator, works on the assembly of the mitotic spindle apparatus, so the chromosomal separation in the mitosis, this stabilizes MYCN. So they go out together. And Aurora kinase A I think is the hallmark, at least from what I can understand now in the biology of neuroendocrine prostate cancer in the development of this lethal disease.

And you can see it here again. And this is important because there is a specific drug that can target the Aurora kinase A. This was licensed with Takeda, the name is alisertib. And that has been shown in preclinical studies by Beltran, et. al., which is a beautiful study, to show that it can inhibit significantly or treat neuroendocrine prostate cancer on the basis of the fact that Aurora kinase A is over expressed in neuroendocrine tumors, and actually also in other carcinoma cells that are destined to become neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells.

So this is the clinical trial that was recruiting. It’s an orally administrated AURKA inhibitor given orally, 50 mg twice daily for 7 days, and repeat the cycle in 21 days. They did a study which looked at open-label phase 2 trial, mainly looking at progression. The problem was, and this has been presented in European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) in 2016, now the recent ESMO, showing that it had an effect, but that was kind of a limited effect. So about 3 patients of the 60 had complete response or significant response, but the progression to—radiology progression in 6 months was quite high, and the progression-free survival in 6 months was only 15%.   They explained it in the fact that they were not really enriched for neuroendocrine prostate cancer. But I think this is a very interesting drug, I think because Aurora kinase A amplification is also presenting in a primary adenocarcinoma of the prostate and predict late-stage development of neuroendocrine prostate cancer and castration-resistant prostate cancer, perhaps one can envision the integration of Aurora kinase A inhibitor early on before the disease is full-blown, and this is something that is of interest.

So to wrap up, just to give you what I call a cognitive doggy-bag, if you will, a take-home message, I think neuroendocrine prostate cancer develops from adenocarcinoma of the prostate, okay. This process results from selective pressure, and please be aware that we inducing it in our own hands. This is the trade-off of this sophisticated deep castration, as well as the addition now of cytotoxic agents, and it involves specific molecular pathways. And if you have to remember one, please remember the Aurora kinase A. There is increased incidence of neuroendocrine prostate cancer in the current era of novel ADT agents, which is suspected. I didn’t see really hard data on that. And we have to compare it to historical control, and they have their own selective advantages. And one thing perhaps to target them is to target their own secretion, which fuels up the neighboring adenocarcinoma cells by virtue of their paracrine factors, and there is potential targeted therapy, Aurora kinase A inhibitors, which I think needs to be used more selectively. Thank you.