How to cite: Crawford ED. PET Tumor Board: Negative PSMA PET Imaging in Biochemical Recurrence with Incidental Detection of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma. Grand Rounds in Urology. October 2026. Accessed Oct 2026. https://grandroundsinurology.com/pet-tumor-board-negative-psma-pet-imaging-in-biochemical-recurrence-with-incidental-detection-of-primary-lung-adenocarcinoma/
In this presentation, E. David Crawford, MD, Editor-in-Chief of Grand Rounds in Urology and Professor of Urology at the University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, moderates a multidisciplinary discussion of a case of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in which repeated prostate-directed positron emission tomography (PET) imaging failed to localize definitive recurrent disease, but surveillance imaging identified an incidental primary lung adenocarcinoma.
The panel of experts includes:
- Wayne G. Brisbane, MD, Assistant Professor of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Sherief H. Gamie, MD, PhD, Chief – Medical Director of the Nuclear/Molecular Imaging and Theranostics Program and a Professor of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
- Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, Chief of Genitourinary Oncology, Professor of Medicine and Urology, Yale University Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut
- Peter Rossi, MD, FABS, FASTRO, Radiation Oncologist, Calaway-Young Cancer Center at Valley View Hospital, Glenwood Springs, Colorado
The discussion highlights the interpretation of negative and equivocal prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) findings, the role of PET and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET imaging, and management priorities when prostate cancer recurrence overlaps with a suspicious pulmonary lesion.
The case involves a 62-year-old man with Gleason 4+3=7 pT2N0 prostate adenocarcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy in 2017 with negative margins. In 2020, the patient developed biochemical recurrence and received salvage radiation therapy with four months of androgen deprivation therapy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) subsequently rose again, with a doubling time of approximately 6 months, reaching 0.69 ng/mL by March 2026, coincident with recovered testosterone levels.
The patient underwent multiple imaging scans. The PSMA scans did not identify definitive recurrent prostate cancer, but PET imaging revealed a suspicious left apical lung lesion.
The panel discusses whether the lesion could represent metastatic prostate cancer lacking PSMA expression versus a second primary malignancy. They debate the value of FDG PET imaging after negative PSMA studies, emphasizing the correlation between PET findings and CT morphology. The group ultimately recommends tissue diagnosis and surgical resection.
The panel concludes that incidental detection of early-stage lung cancer during prostate cancer surveillance imaging may provide a clinically meaningful opportunity for curative intervention while ongoing prostate cancer monitoring continues separately.