Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, FASTRO, FASCO

Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, FASTRO, FASCO

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas

Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, FASTRO, FASCO, is Professor and Chair of Radiation Oncology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. Dr. Hamstra specializes in prostate cancer and tumors of the brain and spine with a particular focus on understanding patients’ experience both during and after treatment. His work has made a substantial impact on the growing understanding and appreciation of patient reported quality of life after radiation therapy. He has led local and national clinical trials of radiation therapy in prostate cancer and is an active member of several medical professional societies including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology, and SWOG.

Disclosures:

Talks by Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, FASTRO, FASCO

Updates in Chemoradiation for Bladder Urothelial Cancer

Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, FASTRO, FASCO, discusses updates in chemoradiation for bladder urothelial cancer. He compares data from a retrospective review on cystectomy vs. trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, explaining that the data showed no difference in metastasis-free survival and minimal difference in overall survival.

Dr. Hamstra shares data from a study on local therapy in clinical node-positive bladder cancer that showed no difference in OS or progression-free survival with surgery vs. radiation therapy. He then explains that surgical management is critical for bladder preservation therapy.

Dr. Hamstra explains the North American trimodality therapy patient selection process and explains that, while it excludes poor responders to treatment (therefore ensuring a higher likelihood of bladder preservation,) it also excludes many patients. He outlines the UK approach to therapy, calling it a broader-based treatment.

Dr. Hamstra then summarizes data on chemoradiation for MIBC that show locoregional control was substantially better, and metastasis-free survival was somewhat better, when chemotherapy was combined with radiation therapy vs. radiation therapy alone. He then addresses whether concurrent chemoradiation therapy is needed following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, explaining while it has potentially smaller impact on the other endpoints, chemoradiation therapy still increased locoregional control and invasive locoregional control.

Dr. Hamstra addresses radiation therapy, its role and the best approach to radiation therapy delivery. Dr. Hamstra shares data out of Pakistan comparing bladder-only radiation therapy vs. pelvis and bladder radiation therapy that shows no improvement when treating the pelvic lymph nodes.

Dr. Hamstra concludes that trimodality bladder preservation represents a viable but under-utilized option for bladder cancer. It is a viable option in non-operative candidates or node-positive disease, and there are multiple chemotherapy options. He points out the importance of coordinated care and newer agents that may be used with radiation therapy to improve outcomes.

Read More

The Role of Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer and How to Treat the Primary in De Novo Oligometastatic Disease

Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, FASTRO, FASCO, discusses the use of radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer treatment and how to approach treating the primary in de novo oligometastatic disease. In this presentation, Dr. Hamstra covers:

The history and definition of oligometastatic disease.
The history of radiation therapy in localized and metastatic prostate cancer.
Results from the STAMPEDE, PEACE-1, and STOMP and ORIOLE trials.
The Pros and Cons of including radiation therapy in systemic therapy.
Progression to Survival and Overall Survival rates in radiation therapy patients.

Dr. Hamstra concludes by highlighting the need for more data on low-volume versus high-volume patients, and he recommends enrolling eligible patients in the ongoing SWOG S1802 trial.

Read More

Bladder-Sparing Trimodality Therapy

Daniel A. Hamstra, MD, PhD, Chairman and Professor of Radiation Oncology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, discusses bladder-sparing trimodality therapy for patients with bladder cancer, explaining the role of each aspect of care, outcomes in terms of quality of life, and the potential future role of checkpoint inhibitors. He begins by noting that successful organ preservation approaches in oncology are common (e.g., in breast cancer, head and neck cancer, and extremity sarcoma) and can reasonably be applied to bladder cancer as well. Dr. Hamstra then introduces the standard care pathway for trimodality bladder preservation, from transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to radiotherapy with radiosensitizing agent, to follow-up with repeat cystoscopy. He goes into detail about the role of each portion of treatment, arguing that surgical management, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiation therapy are all critical to treatment success. Dr. Hamstra also discusses how radiation should be delivered in terms of effectiveness and toxicity and considers the question of whether to treat the bladder only or the pelvis and bladder with radiation. He then looks at patient-reported quality of life after bladder preservation, highlighting that while many patients report declines in bladder-related quality of life immediately following chemoradiotherapy, they generally improve to baseline after 6 months, and ⅔ of patients report stable or improved quality of life on long-term follow-up. Finally, Dr. Hamstra touches on future additions to bladder-sparing treatment such as checkpoint inhibitors, highlighting the ongoing INTACT trial of concurrent chemoradiation with or without atezolizumab for localized muscle invasive bladder cancer. He concludes that trimodality bladder preservation represents a viable but underutilized option for T2-T4 bladder cancer that requires coordinated care between urology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. Dr. Hamstra reiterates that each component of treatment is critical, quality of life outcomes are excellent, and newer agents may also improve outcomes.

Read More

Join the GRU Community

- Why Join? -