Higher resilience in radical cystectomy patients is associated with improved health related quality of life post-operatively
Abstract:
Background
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusions
The role of blue light cystoscopy and additional operative evaluations during first surveillance after induction therapy for high-risk NMIBC
Abstract:
Background
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Organoid models in bladder cancer: From bench to bedside?
Abstract:
Background
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Intravesical instillation of chemotherapy before surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer
Urothelial cancer that occurs in the bladder following radical surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) occurs in 22–47% of cases within two years.1,2 There are many proposed reasons for this occurring including the possibility of pan-urothelial cancer diathesis, recurrence of previously treated bladder cancer, technical factors including not taking a complete bladder cuff at the time of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU),3 not clipping the distal ureter early on in the case,4 or whether/and how the diagnosis of UTUC was made, as evidence of a contributory role for diagnostic ureteroscopy has become compelling.5 To try to reduce this recurrence rate, two randomized prospective trials (each with their own flaws) have “demonstrated” that a single postoperative instillation of chemotherapy6,7 does reduce one- and two-year bladder recurrences. However, in part because of concern about potential extravasation of the chemotherapy, postoperative instillations have not been widely adopted into practice.7,8
Advancements in systemic therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review from the beginning to the latest updates
Abstract:
Context
Objective
Evidence acquisition
Evidence synthesis
Conclusion
The importance of maximal TURBT in trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)
Abstract:
Trimodality therapy (TMT), consisting of maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, has emerged as a bladder-sparing alternative to radical cystectomy for select patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). While each component of TMT plays a critical role, maximal TURBT is foundational to its success. This review examines the importance of maximal TURBT in optimizing oncological outcomes in TMT, discusses its technical nuances, and explores the evidence supporting its role in achieving durable local control and improving survival outcomes in MIBC.
Emerging bladder-sparing treatments for high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Abstract:
Bladder cancer (BC) is a significant global health concern, with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) comprising 75% of cases at diagnosis. High-risk NMIBC (HR-NMIBC) poses a significant therapeutic challenge due to its high recurrence and progression rates despite Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy. Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard for BCG-unresponsive cases but is often met with considerable morbidity and patient reluctance. This has driven research into alternative bladder-sparing therapies (BSTs). Emerging BSTs include immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and novel agents such as nadofaragene firadenovec and nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (IL-15). These therapies have demonstrated promising response rates in clinical trials, offering potential for disease management while preserving bladder function. Gene therapies and targeted agents like CG0070 and EG-70 are also gaining traction for their innovative mechanisms. However, most data are derived from early-phase, single-arm studies, necessitating larger, randomised trials for validation. Device-assisted strategies, including hyperthermic and electromotive drug delivery systems, show potential to enhance intravesical therapy efficacy. Despite advancements, challenges remain in balancing efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness within diverse healthcare settings. This narrative review highlights the evolving landscape of BSTs for HR-NMIBC, emphasising the need for robust clinical evidence to refine patient selection and optimise outcomes.