Topic: Imaging

Novel Imaging for Renal Mass Characterization

In this 18-minute presentation, Mohammed E. Allaf, MD, discusses novel imaging techniques for renal mass characterization, emphasizing advancements and their clinical implications. He outlines the traditional imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI, which, despite their utility, have limitations that lead to indeterminate findings, necessitating further diagnostic procedures.

Dr. Allaf highlights multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and PET imaging as tools in this advanced era of molecular imaging. For example, advancements in PET imaging contribute significantly to the management of renal cell carcinoma, enabling more accurate staging and potentially guiding targeted therapies. He underscores that radiologists, urologists, and oncologists must collaborate to interpret imaging results accurately and develop individualized treatment plans for patients.

Read More

Kidney Preservation for Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current State and Future Directions

Jay D. Raman, MD, examines the evolving strategies and treatment paradigms aimed at preserving kidney function in patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Dr. Raman highlights the clinical significance of kidney preservation, given the substantial morbidity associated with radical nephroureterectomy, the traditional standard of care.

Dr. Raman emphasizes the importance of patient selection, detailing how advancements in diagnostic imaging and risk stratification enable more precise identification of candidates for kidney-sparing approaches. He discusses the role of endoscopic management, such as laser ablation and segmental ureterectomy, underscoring their efficacy and safety in appropriately selected patients. Furthermore, he examines the integration of perioperative therapies, including intraluminal chemotherapy and immunotherapy, as adjuncts to enhance local control and reduce recurrence rates.

Read More

Diagnosing Renal Masses: Do Advanced Imaging Techniques and Biomarkers Play an Important Role?

Justin J. Badal, MD, explores how advancements in imaging techniques and biomarkers enhance diagnostic accuracy, inform treatment decisions, and potentially improve patient outcomes. He acknowledges the limitations of traditional imaging modalities, such as ultrasound and computed tomography (CT), and emphasizes the need for more precise tools.
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT or MRI, and the use of biomarkers are all analyzed. These advanced diagnostic tools have the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, guide treatment decisions, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. They are a significant step forward in the personalized management of renal cancer.

Read More

Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: Active Surveillance and Follow-up After Intervention

In part 2 of a 2-part series, Steven C. Campbell, MD, PhD, Professor of Surgery, Associate Director of Graduate Medical Education, Program Director and Vice Chair of Urology, and Eric A. Klein Chair for Urologic Oncology and Education at the Cleveland Clinic’s Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, presents significant 2021 updates to the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on localized renal cancer, focusing on active surveillance (AS) and follow-up. Dr. Campbell, who served as Chair of the AUA Guidelines Panel for Management of Localized Kidney Cancer, begins by looking at the major revisions made to the AS guidelines, particularly with regard to specifications on which patients really should be considered for AS, the intensity of surveillance in different settings, and the role of renal mass biopsy. He then considers the revised guidance around follow-up after intervention. Dr. Campbell explains the general principles behind follow-up, highlighting the need to discuss implications of stage, grade, and histology including risks of recurrence and possible sequelae of treatment, as well as the importance of performing periodic imaging, lab studies, and medical histories in patients with treated malignant renal masses. He also covers what to do if surveillance suggests metastases or local recurrence. Dr. Campbell concludes by discussing risk-based protocols and follow-up guidelines based on risk categories and prior treatment.

Read More

Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer Evaluation and Management

In part 1 of a 2-part series, Steven C. Campbell, MD, PhD, Professor of Surgery, Associate Director of Graduate Medical Education, Program Director and Vice Chair of Urology, and Eric A. Klein Chair for Urologic Oncology and Education at the Cleveland Clinic’s Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, presents significant 2021 updates to the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on localized renal cancer, focusing on evaluation and management. After an introduction by E. David Crawford, MD, Professor of Urology at the University of California, San Diego, and Editor-in-Chief of Grand Rounds in Urology, Dr. Campbell, who served as Chair of the AUA Guidelines Panel for Management of Localized Kidney Cancer, explains that the primary focus of the panel was clinically localized renal masses suspicious for cancer in adults, including solid enhancing renal tumors and Bosniak 3 and 4 complex cystic renal masses. He then summarizes what has changed since the last guideline update. For evaluation and diagnosis, he highlights that MRI with contrast can now be used even in patients with severe chronic kidney disease or with end-stage renal disease since the risk of nephrogenic fibrosis with 2nd generation gadolinium agents is extremely low. Dr. Campbell also notes that language has been changed around renal mass biopsy to emphasize a utility-based approach, and that there are expanded indications for genetic counseling since 4 to 6% of cases of renal cell carcinoma are now thought to be familial. He then moves on to look at the revised management guidelines, pointing out a new statement advising that patients with high-risk or locally advanced, fully resected renal cancers should be counseled about the risks/benefits of adjuvant therapy and encouraged to participate in adjuvant clinical trials, facilitated by medical oncology consultation when needed. Dr. Campbell concludes by looking at new guidance on thermal ablation indicating that renal mass biopsy should be performed prior to thermal ablation rather than at the time of thermal ablation.

Read More
Loading

Join the GRU Community

- Why Join? -