Select Page

2024

Integrated Diagnostics (Radiogenomics) and Patient Selection and Monitoring for Active Surveillance, Surgical, and Radiation Treatment

Sanoj Punnen, MD, MAS, discusses the use and benefits of integrated diagnostics for monitoring prostate cancer during Active Surveillance (AS). He begins by noting that AS is becoming a popular treatment for a wide range of low-risk prostate cancers, thanks to more granular risk-stratification methods and an increasing clinical emphasis on lowering patient burden during treatment.

Dr. Punnen then discusses lowering the frequency of serial biopsies as a means of lowering patient burden during treatment. He explores studies which indicate that MRI and Gleason scoring alone are insufficient for monitoring prostate cancer progression.

Dr. Punnen concludes with an exploration of the ongoing Miami MRI-Guided Active Selection for Treatment of Prostate Cancer (MAST) trial examining the use of MRI, 4Kscore, and Decipher scores during AS. The data thus far indicates that MRI alone is not predictive of progression, and that clinicians should consider integrating other prognostic data into their AS treatment protocols.

Read More

Construction and Multi-Center Validation of the Radiomics Model for Non-Invasive Identification of Active Surveillance Candidates

Liang Wang, MD, PhD, presents current data on the use of noninvasive approaches with radiomics models to identify prostate cancer in active surveillance (AS) patients. Dr. Wang begins by sharing data on the risk reduction that early detection provides, but notes risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. He then addresses the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer management, noting improved techniques and better image interpretation by the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS). However, Dr. Wang highlights that other biomarkers along with MRI must guide further diagnosis and treatment.

Dr. Wang discusses the rapidly evolving field of radiomics, explaining it enables the digital decoding of images into quantitative features that may uncover disease characteristics unseen by the naked eye. Further, it assesses a broad set of predefined features to define patterns relevant to pathology using statistical methods.

Dr. Wang concludes by cautioning that current data on the use of radiomics were from single-institution retrospectives with small cohort sizes and an absence of independent, external validation. Dr. Wang mentions broader, ongoing research which may lead to a non-invasive, radiomics-based tool that may be used to identify AS candidates with prostate cancer in the future.

Read More

Physician Coaching and Embracing QI

Ryan P. Terlecki, MD, FACS, presents a model for quality improvement for healthcare providers, drawing from professional sports coaching. He begins by articulating the professional parallels between physicians and quarterbacks, noting that the best performers in each field have strong professional support networks and constant performance evaluation.

Dr. Terlecki then discusses how quality improvement measures used in professional sports apply to medical practice. He supports his points by presenting data from studies where “playbacks” of urologic surgeries were used to effectively improve surgeon performance.

Dr. Terlecki concludes by emphasizing the benefits of being open to feedback and making efforts to improve for both healthcare professionals and patients. He encourages healthcare professionals to be open to both giving and receiving coaching in their practices, and provides actionable advice for implementing these quality improvement measures.

Dr. Terlecki provides guidance on tailoring patient intake questionnaires to keep the focus on the patient’s issue and possible approaches. He gives examples of open and closed questions for male genital pain.

Dr. Terlecki then discusses the importance of setting patient expectations regarding diagnoses and what they should expect from the provider, particularly when the provider does not specialize in pain management. He then discusses common, uncommon, and overlooked causes of male genital pain.

Dr. Terlecki concludes by walking through this algorithm from intake to assessment to diagnosis and treatment. He emphasizes the importance of not dismissing patient input on treatment, but still strictly adhere to evidence-based treatment over unproven or alternative treatments.

Read More

In-office Therapies for Men with Erectile Dysfunction

Jesse N. Mills, MD, discusses the effectiveness of a selection of experimental in-office therapies for erectile dysfunction treatment. Throughout his presentation, Dr. Mills explores the outlook, benefits, and challenges of experimental therapy options currently pushed by external market forces, including:

Low-intensity Shockwave Therapy (LiSWT)
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)
Stem Cell Therapy
Intracavernosal Injection (ICI)
Hyperbaric Oxygen

Dr. Mills concludes by stressing that although these therapy options are still considered experimental, urologists should strive to observe these therapies and hold balanced conversations with patients regarding their efficacy. He encourages urologists to stay optimistic about erectile dysfunction treatment as stewards of male health, suggesting they watch for new data in the world of experimental treatments.

Read More

Biomarkers Made Simple

Peter A. Pinto, MD, presents an overview of the roles of biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and screening. In his presentation, Dr. Pinto covers:

Biomarkers Categorization
Tissue-Based Biomarkers
Emerging Urine-Based Biomarkers
Biomarker Detection
Challenges and Opportunities in Biomarker Research

Read More

Join the GRU Community

- Why Join? -