Arvin George, MD

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland

Arvin George, MD, serves as Director of Prostate Cancer Programs and Associate Professor (PAR) of Urology at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland. He is a urologic surgeon who specializes in the diagnosis and management of genitourinary cancers. After obtaining his medical degree from the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, he completed his urology residency at the Smith Institute for Urology at the Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine. He remained there to complete his endourology fellowship in New York, gaining additional subspecialty expertise in robotic, laparoscopic, and percutaneous surgery. Subsequently, he completed a urologic oncology fellowship at the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Dr. George’s research interests include minimally-invasive and image-guided treatments, functional prostate imaging, and focal therapy for prostate cancer. His research aims to identify appropriate use for imaging in diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of prostate cancer, including active surveillance and selection/treatment of patients with novel focal therapy modalities.

Talks by Arvin George, MD

Transperineal vs Transrectal Biopsy Clinical Trials: Mo’ Data Mo’ Problems

Posted by Arvin George, MD | Dec 2024

Arvin K. George, MD, delves into the nuances of prostate cancer biopsy techniques, focusing on the comparison between transperineal and transrectal approaches.

In this 14-minute presentation, Dr. George shares that transperineal and transrectal biopsies demonstrate equivalent cancer detection rates, particularly for clinically significant prostate cancer. However, some retrospective data suggest potential advantages of transperineal biopsy in specific anatomical areas, with notable studies emphasizing the reduced risk of infections with transperineal biopsy. Dr. George also discusses a decreased need for antibiotics and the use of local anesthesia in a transperineal approach.

Further, Dr. George reflects on the implications for clinical practice, antibiotic stewardship, and cost-effectiveness for transperineal and transrectal approaches. His talk provides a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence, encouraging a balanced and thoughtful approach to biopsy method selection.