Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Management: Essentials for the General Urologist
Jay Simhan, MD, FACS, explores artificial urinary sphincters in patients with prolonged catheterization, hematuria, and bladder tumors.
Read MoreSelect Page
by Jay Simhan, MD, FACS | Jun 2025
Jay Simhan, MD, FACS, explores artificial urinary sphincters in patients with prolonged catheterization, hematuria, and bladder tumors.
Read Moreby E. David Crawford, MD, Wayne G. Brisbane, MD, Sean P. Collins MD, PhD, Sherief H. Gamie, MD and Daniel P. Petrylak, MD | Jun 2025
E. David Crawford, MD, presents a case of a 55-year-old prostate cancer survivor with rising PSA five years after radical prostatectomy.
Read Moreby William O. Brant, MD, FACS, FECSM | Jun 2025
William O. Brant, MD, FACS, FECSM, explores the complexities of medical malpractice and its impact on physicians.
Read Moreby Christian P. Pavlovich, MD | Jun 2025
Christian P. Pavlovich, MD, provides a detailed overview of serum and urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
Read MoreMaha H. Hussain, MD, discusses darolutamide (Nubeqa) combined with androgen deprivation therapy, with or without docetaxel.
Read Moreby Steven P. Rowe, MD, PhD | Jun 2025
Steven P. Rowe, MD, PhD, delves into the transformative potential and challenges of radioligand therapy in managing advanced prostate cancer. In this 21-minute presentation, Dr. Rowe emphasizes the excitement surrounding the efficacy and tolerability of agents like lutetium PSMA-617, contrasting them with harsher cytotoxic treatments. A nuanced discussion addresses pitfalls in PSMA PET imaging, highlighting false positives and underscoring the necessity of careful interpretation.
Toxicity management and manageable side effects are discussed. Innovations in imaging biomarkers and longitudinal PSMA PET imaging are positioned as tools to refine response assessment and personalize therapy.
Given differences in training and systemic constraints, challenges in translating European advancements to US practice are acknowledged. Further, Dr. Rowe critiques limitations in AI and radiomics applications for PET scans, highlighting the inability to characterize findings accurately. Ultimately, Dr. Rowe advocates integrating PSMA PET into clinical trials and enhancing therapy stratification to maximize patient benefit.
Read Moreby Mira Keyes, MD, FRCPC, FABS | Jun 2025
Mira Keyes, MD, FRCPC, FABS, discusses the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation for prostate cancer treatment.
Read Moreby Amy Krambeck, MD | Jun 2025
Amy E. Krambeck, MD, explores the management of urolithiasis in pregnancy, emphasizing the challenges of diagnosis and treatment.
Read Moreby Brian T. Helfand, MD, PhD | Jun 2025
Brian T. Helfand, MD, PhD, discusses recent advancements in imaging techniques for prostate cancer detection and management.
Read MoreAnn E. Stapleton, MD, provides a timely update on the therapeutic management of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women.
Read Moreby Veeru Kasivisvanathan, MBBS, BSc, FRCS, PhD, MSc, PGCert | Jun 2025
Veeru Kasivisvanathan, MBBS, BSc, FRCS, PhD, MSc, PGCert, reflects on the significant advancements in prostate imaging over the last decade, emphasizing the transformative role of MRI. A central question in this 15-minute presentation is whether prostate cancer can be diagnosed and managed without a biopsy. While biopsies are the current standard, they carry risks such as sepsis, patient discomfort, and financial burden.
The PROMIS study demonstrated MRI’s ability to detect all Gleason 4+3 cancers, though it also revealed MRI’s high number of false positives. Combining PSMA PET with MRI improves sensitivity to 97%, particularly for detecting clinically significant cancers, but specificity remains a challenge, raising concerns about unnecessary treatment. New scoring systems, like the P score, integrate PET avidity and PI-RADS scores to refine risk assessment and treatment decisions.
Kasivisvanathan discusses the concept of “biopsy-light” pathways, citing cohorts where patients undergo fewer biopsies, with monitoring driven by MRI and PSA changes. This approach shows promising compliance and oncological outcomes comparable to standard active surveillance but with less patient burden. Despite advancements, a fully biopsy-free pathway remains unfeasible due to limitations in MRI standardization, interpretation variability, and a lack of high-volume data.
Read Moreby Daniel P. Petrylak, MD | Jun 2025
Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, focuses on PARP inhibitors in managing prostate cancer, particularly in patients with DNA repair deficiencies.
Read More