Video

Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: Active Surveillance and Follow-up After Intervention

In part 2 of a 2-part series, Steven C. Campbell, MD, PhD, Professor of Surgery, Associate Director of Graduate Medical Education, Program Director and Vice Chair of Urology, and Eric A. Klein Chair for Urologic Oncology and Education at the Cleveland Clinic’s Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, presents significant 2021 updates to the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on localized renal cancer, focusing on active surveillance (AS) and follow-up. Dr. Campbell, who served as Chair of the AUA Guidelines Panel for Management of Localized Kidney Cancer, begins by looking at the major revisions made to the AS guidelines, particularly with regard to specifications on which patients really should be considered for AS, the intensity of surveillance in different settings, and the role of renal mass biopsy. He then considers the revised guidance around follow-up after intervention. Dr. Campbell explains the general principles behind follow-up, highlighting the need to discuss implications of stage, grade, and histology including risks of recurrence and possible sequelae of treatment, as well as the importance of performing periodic imaging, lab studies, and medical histories in patients with treated malignant renal masses. He also covers what to do if surveillance suggests metastases or local recurrence. Dr. Campbell concludes by discussing risk-based protocols and follow-up guidelines based on risk categories and prior treatment.

Read More

COVID-19 Updates with Congressman Greg Murphy, MD

Congressman Gregory F. Murphy, MD, a practicing urologist and the Representative from North Carolina’s 3rd District, considers how the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting medical institutions, particularly focusing on vaccine mandates. After an introduction from E. David Crawford, MD, Editor-in-Chief of Grand Rounds in Urology and Professor of Urology at the University of California, San Diego, Rep. Murphy notes that COVID fatigue has now transformed into COVID exasperation. He recommends, as most physicians do, that everyone eligible gets vaccinated, observing that the vast majority of people in the ICU with COVID-19 are unvaccinated. Rep. Murphy suggests that vaccine mandates are a more complicated issue, explaining that now that deadlines have passed for staff to get vaccinated at hospitals, many institutions are having to let nurses and other integral staff go due to their beliefs. He also poses the questions of whether or not vaccination will be required on an annual basis and of whether acquired immunity from having had COVID-19 could be considered equivalent to vaccination. Rep. Murphy then briefly considers possible new treatments for COVID-19, noting that although there are several pre-existing drugs on the market that have shown promise for COVID, there is not a profit incentive for these to be tested in COVID trials. The conversation concludes with a brief discussion of current government funding issues related to the debt ceiling, the infrastructure bill, and the reconciliation package.

Read More

Focal Cryosurgery: Outcomes and Observations

Thomas J. Polascik, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery at Duke University and Director of Surgical Technology at the Duke Prostate and Urological Cancer Center, discusses focal cryosurgery for prostate cancer and its functional outcomes. He introduces, as a typical example of his patients, the case of a 64-year-old mostly healthy man who is concerned with the side effects of radical prostatectomy. Dr. Polascik describes the 21st century prostate cancer patient and discusses how and why doctors’ recommendations are becoming less influential, especially when it comes to active surveillance. He returns to the case of the 64-year-old man and shows how cryo-probes are used in an overlapping manner to create a kill zone, and then outlines the procedure. Dr. Polascik reviews a study on Vitamin D3 as a sensitizer to cryoablation that found that on post-treatment day 9, freezing with Vitamin D3 has near a 98% reduction in cell repopulation compared to just freezing. He discusses functional outcomes such as high rates of continence, failure-free survival rates of about 75% at 5 years, 100% metastasis-free survival, and no infield recurrence of Gleason grade 2 or higher in anterior gland focal cryoablation. Dr. Polascik concludes with a look at the future of focal cryoablation, highlighting its ability to maintain quality of life, serve as durable cancer control, be pain-free, and support rapid recovery.

Read More

Updates on PSMA Imaging and PSMA CAR T Therapy

Daniel P. Petrylak, MD, Director of Genitourinary Oncology, Professor of Medicine and Urology, Co-Leader of Cancer Signaling Networks, and Co-Director of the Signal Transduction Program at Yale University Cancer Center in New Haven, Connecticut, discusses CAR T therapy for prostate cancer and the ways in which its efficacy is impacted by tumor type and stem memory T cells (TSCM). He begins by reviewing the VISION Trial of LuPSMA which found a 40% reduction in the risk of death and 4-month improvement in median overall survival (OS) versus standard of care (SOC) alone. He also looks at the FDA approval of PYLARIFY in May 2021, the first commercially available PSMA PET imaging agent for prostate cancer. Dr. Petrylak then poses the question of how to combine immunotherapy with PSMA. He suggests that the answer may exist in CAR T therapy despite its historically poor results in solid tumors, and discusses the different types of CAR T cells along a spectrum of less differentiated, self-renewing, and long-lived cells to more differentiated, less stem-like cells. Dr. Petrylak states that TSCM, which exist on the less differentiated side of the spectrum, are key to CAR T therapy’s success in solid tumors based on evidence from a study using a TSCM-based approach that found 100% tumor elimination in animals at standard and low doses after 2 weeks. He reviews early information on a Phase I trial of TSCM based CAR T therapy on mCRPC patients which appears to have positive early results. Dr. Petrylak concludes that PSMA is proving to be an excellent target for imaging and therapy in mCRPC and CAR T therapy may be able to enhance treatment as well.

Read More

Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer Evaluation and Management

In part 1 of a 2-part series, Steven C. Campbell, MD, PhD, Professor of Surgery, Associate Director of Graduate Medical Education, Program Director and Vice Chair of Urology, and Eric A. Klein Chair for Urologic Oncology and Education at the Cleveland Clinic’s Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, presents significant 2021 updates to the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on localized renal cancer, focusing on evaluation and management. After an introduction by E. David Crawford, MD, Professor of Urology at the University of California, San Diego, and Editor-in-Chief of Grand Rounds in Urology, Dr. Campbell, who served as Chair of the AUA Guidelines Panel for Management of Localized Kidney Cancer, explains that the primary focus of the panel was clinically localized renal masses suspicious for cancer in adults, including solid enhancing renal tumors and Bosniak 3 and 4 complex cystic renal masses. He then summarizes what has changed since the last guideline update. For evaluation and diagnosis, he highlights that MRI with contrast can now be used even in patients with severe chronic kidney disease or with end-stage renal disease since the risk of nephrogenic fibrosis with 2nd generation gadolinium agents is extremely low. Dr. Campbell also notes that language has been changed around renal mass biopsy to emphasize a utility-based approach, and that there are expanded indications for genetic counseling since 4 to 6% of cases of renal cell carcinoma are now thought to be familial. He then moves on to look at the revised management guidelines, pointing out a new statement advising that patients with high-risk or locally advanced, fully resected renal cancers should be counseled about the risks/benefits of adjuvant therapy and encouraged to participate in adjuvant clinical trials, facilitated by medical oncology consultation when needed. Dr. Campbell concludes by looking at new guidance on thermal ablation indicating that renal mass biopsy should be performed prior to thermal ablation rather than at the time of thermal ablation.

Read More