Molecular Diagnostic of Prostate Cancer Based on Non Invasive Liquid Biopsies
Jack A Schalken, PhD, and E. David Crawford, MD, discuss recent advances in non invasive liquid...
Read MoreSelect Page
Posted by Jack A. Schalken, PhD | Feb 2018
Jack A Schalken, PhD, and E. David Crawford, MD, discuss recent advances in non invasive liquid...
Read MorePosted by Phillip J. Koo, MD | Feb 2018
Dr. Phillip J. Koo, MD, discusses advanced tools such as multi-parametric MRI and PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging, and how they outperform traditional, previously available methods.
Read MorePosted by Scott T. Tagawa, MD | Feb 2018
Scott T. Tagawa, MD, Weill Cornell Medicine, provides an overview of radiogland therapy and...
Read MorePosted by Robert Abouassaly, MD | Feb 2018
Robert Abouassaly, MD, argues that the DECIPHER marker is not an ideal test for predicting patient’s response to chemotherapy. He cites the inconclusiveness of trials and research and the cost inefficiency of this biomarker. Also, he explains that the DECIPHER test’s classification system is based on RNA expression profiles, and not meant for therapeutic guidance. This is a counter argument to Alan H. Bryce’s lecture, “The DECIPHER Marker Can Predict Chemotherapy.”
Read MorePosted by Alan H. Bryce, MD | Feb 2018
Dr. Alan H. Bryce, MD, discusses the newest advances and research in prostate cancer treatments that target androgen receptors, such as BET inhibitors and CYP17 inhibitors, as opposed to chemotherapeutic and radiopharmaceutical approaches.
Read More