Peter A. Pinto, MD

Peter A. Pinto, MD

U.S. National Institutes of Health

Bethesda, MD

Peter A. Pinto, MD, is an Investigator and faculty member in the Urologic Oncology Branch of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland. Following a residency in Urologic Surgery at Long Island Jewish Medical Center - Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, he was a Fellow and Clinical Instructor at the Brady Urologic Institute at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Pinto is a board-certified urologic surgeon specializing in oncology and is the Director of the Urologic Oncology Fellowship Program at the National Cancer Institute. He is nationally and internationally recognized as an expert in the minimally invasive treatment of urologic cancers, specializing in laparoscopic and robotic surgery for prostate, kidney, bladder, and testicular cancer.

Disclosures:

Talks by Peter A. Pinto, MD

Fusion Biopsy Technologies and Techniques

Peter A. Pinto, MD, discusses the evolution of prostate cancer biopsy and imaging techniques in the past twenty years, from blind systematic biopsies to MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsies. He begins by noting that prostate cancer was the only solid-organ tumor diagnosed without image guidance going into the 21st century.

When MRI was introduced as an imaging modality for prostate cancer diagnosis, urologists developed several different techniques for incorporating MRI into biopsy procedures. Dr. Pinto briefly covers the history and development of in-bore biopsies, cognitive fusion biopsies, and MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsies.

He concludes with reviewing the currently available devices in this space. He evaluates each system as it relates to biopsy needle targeting route, tracking and navigation, MRI-ultrasound fusion opportunities, ultrasound image acquisition, and biopsy fixation.

Read More

Biomarkers Made Simple

Peter A. Pinto, MD, presents an overview of the roles of biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and screening. In his presentation, Dr. Pinto covers:

Biomarkers Categorization
Tissue-Based Biomarkers
Emerging Urine-Based Biomarkers
Biomarker Detection
Challenges and Opportunities in Biomarker Research

Read More

Focal and Salvage Therapies for Prostate Cancer: What’s Worth It and What’s Not?

Peter A. Pinto, MD, examines the current state of focal and salvage therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer, and offers his insights into which therapies are worth pursuing. He begins by addressing various kinds of salvage therapy, acknowledging that salvage therapy is a response to failed focal, radiation, or surgical therapy, and specifying that this presentation will focus on salvage therapy after failed radiation therapy.

Dr. Pinto explains that focal ablation therapy, whole gland ablation therapy, and surgical therapy are the most common salvage therapies after a radiation therapy failure. He recommends using an MRI-based biopsy method over more traditional methods to maximize accuracy in identifying lesions.

Dr. Pinto then recommends focal ablation over whole gland ablation as a salvage therapy after failed radiation therapy due to the high morbidity associated with whole gland ablation. Dr. Pinto concludes by listing the many ablation options for salvage therapy, and presents studies which examined the pros and cons of each option, offering his insights on each study.

Read More

Should MRI Be Used to Monitor for AS? Pro Argument

Peter A. Pinto, MD, argues that MRI can help select prostate cancer patients for active surveillance (AS). While MRI has some limitations, with proper application, it can reduce patient and urologist anxiety, repeat biopsies, and amount of cores taken during AS. Subsequently, this will reduce morbidity, bleeding, erectile dysfunction, and infections related to biopses.

Read More
  • 1
  • 2

Join the GRU Community

- Why Join? -